KMA and MP3+G naming on database and better name importing options

[madjim- with the Lord]

Originally Posted by KaraokeHo

I can rip an MP3+G (or WMA+G) at any quality rate I want, and I can zip it into one file that is compressed AND will work with over 90% of the karaoke apps out there, including hosters, file managers, and song book generators. So KMAs are superior how? You're going to have to do better than that. KMAs were invented for the same reason Microsoft invented WMAs: to keep you using their software.

Winter is coming. Can I have some of that wool covering your eyes?

KaraokeHo,
Please take the time to educate yourself on MTU/Hoster and zip files. This issue has been discused in length in this forum. If you have the time, search this forum for zip file and read Admims posts.

One day down the road Hoster won't run zip files, it will convert them to CDMP3G files (a type of KMA) when they are loaded into the program.

Also pay atention to the bit rate choices when you import a CD+G. in Hoster, up to 192k.

I'm just a karaoke host/entertainer and all of my testing a research has shown me the KMA's are better than any other format I've tried. MTU has all of the answers, not me

I'm trying to help, not confuse.


Jim