Legal stance on Sound Choice and Stellar Records

[kilith]

yeah I would do it! CAVS make their own why can't MTU start working on making downloads for their own player I know it does take some time to make it legal with the holders of the orginal music but sure I would go with MTU downloads over SC, THM, PHM, or any other company if their quality matched or was better of at least THM (which is OK but not the best in anyway so far I think Zoom is starting to be the best out there) MTU should maybe even setup some sort of download program with Zoom and THM like CAVS has. I would start with the basics of songs like start with DK 1-99 songs list. It would take a heck of a lot of time to build a database but for MTU users I think it would be worth the wait!

[kilith]

I would have to agree disks are dead... but they are also a great proof of ownership

[Beavis]

if you download .kma's exclusively from MTU to play on their software, ownership would be in the software purchase.

kma's are smaller than mp3-g's

[kilith]

Originally Posted by Beavis

if you download .kma's exclusively from MTU to play on their software, ownership would be in the software purchase.

kma's are smaller than mp3-g's

well yea that I know :p and I also know that if you download the songs that your reciept would be your proof of ownership