![]() |
|
Hoster Help Post Hoster questions, tips and suggestions here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
Hoster removing playlists
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now bear in mind that I am not talking about you or other individuals, I am talking about MTU. I have been working with computers for 30 years, and programming them for 20. I know that if you point fingers at other things then issue a fix, it means either 1) you don't really know what is going on or 2) you are not willing to admit you can make a mistake. I personally can make and have made plenty of mistakes, and when I screw up I say "I screwed up". Nothing in the 3.318 / 3.319 post says anything about deleting playlists. It says nothing about what the problem really was, nor even that there was a programming error. It points fingers in every which direction and talks about things that have nothing to do with the problem. It intimates that Vista is the problem, and I don't use Vista. I had already gone through all the changeLogs for 3.xxx versions, and searched the forums before posting. Nothing said anything about deleting files on XP. There were some mentions of deleting folders and possibly KMA files, and mentioning Vista, but nothing describing my particular problem at all. When I post a fix to a problem with something I write, I include a link to a fix. And if some information is needed to install the fix, like purchase date, I state how you can find that out. Most importantly, I describe the defect in the program and state what happened to cause the fault. None of that is present in the sticky thread here, which makes me wonder why it is sticky. I originally purchased Hoster in November of 2005, I am pretty sure. But beyond that I don't really know. I may have upgraded in December of 2006 or so, but I couldn't tell you for sure. Am I supposed to write a note to myself to note the date? I found my original install email, and nowhere does it say "note this date, you will need it for future upgrades". If they are checking such things, there should be that date in the About for the program, one would think. When I go to Help --> About Hoster, it gives me no help on how I find out whether I am eligible to upgrade. When I click check for updates, nothing there tells me whether I am eligible. The last time I just tried to install it, I was down for a week waiting for a support response as it wiped out my authorization to run it on that computer. I am just frustrated because every time I try to interact with MTU, it is never as simple as "We screwed up, here's the fix. We apologize for your trouble." And it always involves people chiding me that I somehow should have done something to avoid the problem. I have spent almost a thousand dollars with MTU, and I am not happy. I don't use the software anymore for gigs because it lagged badly in feature set, obviating my investment. I have had hassle after hassle trying to figure out how to upgrade and install, manually reentering the same old name, address, and email a dozen times, when nowadays the standard is "click this link". |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Even though most of those that had the files deleted were using Vista there were also those using XP who were having the same problem. Just because playlists were not named as missing does not mean those people didn't also lose some of those. Not everyone saves Playlists. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Dale Douglass 2nd Generation Karaoke I am not a member of the MTU Staff.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
hoster
Well guys vista is causing a lot of problems for everyone and MTU has told us to go back to xp kinda i dont use vista and wont for some time like maybe sp2 or sp3 lol. I had problems with 4xxx on xp also and i know all machines are made up different so tell us the best way to setup windows for a dedicated hosting machine nothing else installed but hoster if thats best. But I will tell you this I would never just install upgrade and think its will work fine again. I would have till now and I also know there is a lot going on in this upgrade. even files that were imported from zips wow what a mess to clear up now. anyway will fix it all up as we go i guess. tell singers im sorry but working on it. lol life is short take it easy all you hoster guys and gals
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
My first clue...oh...I already said that.
In all seriousness, when I read that that the KMA Header was being updated (changed), and, that certain KMA imported trks needed to be "Converted," before performing any "Upgrade," I would have made a Complete BACKUP of my KMAs in case anything went wrong after the Upgrade. This would include Backing UP any .Hst files, et cetra/ et all. Come on guys, 4.0 was a M A J O R Upgrade! Any and all problems reported since the 4.0 release, could have been resolved by going back to 3.321 and overwriting KMAs with the Backup KMAs. End of story. With 20 years Computer experience, I'm sure you must have tried to see if your deleted .HST files were in the RECYCLE BIN. It was MTU who made the decision to "support" VISTA, and, after 6 months, was still at it. Oh, by the way, NEVER EVER discard a previous VERSION OF HOSTER, as MTU NEVER MAKES THEM AVAILABLE AGAIN. Last edited by gd123; September 11th, 2008 at 05:44 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Go to: http://www.mtu.com/upgrades/hoster.htm and note: "Hoster 3.321a - To install and run requires that you have bought Hoster 3.x or an upgrade AFTER May 30, 2006" Versions before that could cause problems for the user. This is why thay are not available. ![]() ![]() Jim ![]()
__________________
![]() http://madjim.com http://www.myspace.com/madjimhall http://www.youtube.com/madjimhall Test Comp #1: P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM * XP Home SP3 * IE8 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Onboard Sound * Onboard Video * * * MTU Rack (Show Computer) * P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM* XP Home SP3 * IE7 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Sound Blaster PCI-512 * ATI Raydeon 9200 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() How well Hoster runs is depenant on how the computer is set up, not on how many programs are installed. Jim ![]()
__________________
![]() http://madjim.com http://www.myspace.com/madjimhall http://www.youtube.com/madjimhall Test Comp #1: P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM * XP Home SP3 * IE8 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Onboard Sound * Onboard Video * * * MTU Rack (Show Computer) * P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM* XP Home SP3 * IE7 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Sound Blaster PCI-512 * ATI Raydeon 9200 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If a NEW feature is added, it doesn't mean that the previous version had a BUG or was UNSTABLE. Besides, some BUGS are VERY USEFUL in previous versions. I have ALL the versions...backed up on several HDs. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
setup
ok jim will I dont have a fast cpu like you do but its not slow 1.2 ghz ram is 756mb. i have all the upgrades and have done all to the machine that mtu tells us to do. and not that i need to use all the features but machine does slow down a lot. Not sure what i can turn off as far as proseesing goes and that part of it for me is not a problem can work around it just thought i would mention that it does. They say it will run on less a machine or a minumum for program and all im saying is i find that hard to believe if everything is in use. dont have mutch on show machine anyway so if i can tweak windows to run hoster better please point me in the right direction thanks jim for reply.
PS i dont have a complain just an observation |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://www.blackviper.com/ It is geared toward the gaming community but the same rules apply to running a lean and mean machine. It will help you determine what you can do without to save clock cycles. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
msconfig
yes i like that one will try it out msconfig ty.
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|