Host without Hoster?

[muzicman144]

The need to be right is overwhelming in a lot of people.

i ASSUMED that we are talking about a malfunction that creates the necessity of choosing a disc player over Hoster, not eliminating the ability of using whatever backup one has to choosefrom. How long would it take you to get back to Hoster??????
In your prior post you stated that disc were faster, but you liked the sound better in Hoster. The fact is, re-creating the sound files in hoster does not improve the sound, but in fact the sound is not as good. In fact, hoster acknowledges this fact and has down a great job of giving the user the choice of a larger file-better sound, or a smaller file-not as good sound.
After re-reading your post, you would be, by your own statements, better off to ditch your hoster program and go back to the "ole fashioned way".

I would think that a malfunction of one's equipment in a show would be a disaster if one had to go back to the disc. The scramble to get the discs out, get organized would really be time consuming. Using the computer backup, i would be back in business in five minutes or less.

I agree with Bryan and would not go back to disc, because in reality, there is no need to make the choice. Because most of us have computer backup, the "show still goes on" and in fact, hoster gives KJs a better rep.We have the best product on the market.

I think it would interesting to hear from Hoster users on their back-up issues in case of a malfunction, or their experience with a malfunction and how they addressed it. Could be useful info for all.

i do appreciate your comments, and hope nothing is taken personally

muzicman144