![]() |
|
Hoster Help Post Hoster questions, tips and suggestions here. |
View Poll Results: help | |||
1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() Last edited by mikedomi; November 12th, 2002 at 06:50 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have finally ordered the laptop and Hoster. Have been giving lot's of thought to what changes I will have to make from the 4oo disc player to the laptop and the idea of song numbers came to mind. With Hoster there will no longer be a need for Disc # 6 Track # 11, etc. What numbering system have those of you who have made the switch gone with?
Kelly |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
you can choose between book i.d. (single number) and your method.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Song Book Question
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Those of you who are using Hoster with XP Pro; Is it best to use the new NTFS or stay with the FAT32?
Kelly |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know if I am interpretting this wrong or not but it seems the originator of this thread is asking about sharing songfiles between computers- my understanding of the hoster program is that the songs loaded onto one computer are not transferable to a second as that would allow a karaoke hosting company to utilize one set of discs in multiple machines which is a violation of copyright laws if I understand them at all. From what I understand one original disc- one copy with the original disc stored somewhere so it can't used in another system. Please MTUSUPPORT correct me if I am wrong. but I don't think I am as I have a buddy of mine who went through the ASCAP inspection to make sure he wasn't using more than one copy in all his systems.
ADMIN NOTE: Hoster does not prevent recording songs under one Hoster and copying those songs to another disc. We made the decision not to play Karaoke Kops as everyone else in the world seems to try to be doing that. Yes, it is illegal to run more shows at the same time than you have disc copies. Thus, you should always make sure you have the same number of discs as copies of Hoster running their imported songs. MikeD is talking about (FYI impeging = importing) importing half a disc set on one computer with Hoster, and the other half on a second. Then copying the songs from both to the alternate discs. THIS WILL WORK!!! All it takes is spend about 10 seconds to say the first import person uses BookID from 1 to 1000 and the second person use 1001 to 2000 (or anything but 1 to 1000!!!). Then, when you run the "Rebuild Song Database" function it will locate all .kma files and there will not be any duplicate BookIDs. This is not a bug, but a user request that we could make a bit more automated, but right now is not worth the time investment. It only takes a user 10 seconds to prevent this problem. Sorry we did not think of this earlier, but you guys are very creative!!! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
this is why i asked mtu for a converting tool that can be run more than one time. or a tool that would scan your hard disk for .kma files.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Danny_g,
I think what got this whole thing stirred up was my question about the difference between NTFS (XP Pro) and (XP Pro)FAT32. The file system its self. I am wanting to give my home computer over to my wife for her to use and network my MTU laptop with hoster, when I'm not KJing so I can still use the home computer and not put anything extra on the laptop. I felt it important for them both to be utilizing the same file system; NOT sharing hoster files. Clear as mud??? ![]() Kelly |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Been watching with more than a bit of amusement, and it all brings up a question in my mind. If MIKEDOMBROWSKI is not a kj, then why all the controversy to begin with? Haven't seen anybody that's going to be using the program concerned about this point.
I agree with MIKEDOMBROWSKI that MTU needs to be focusing on the important points, rather that something simple like key change that can come later, but also have enough faith in MTU to believe that they have sense enough to know there are going to be multiple users out there who will have this problem, and will have a solution very shortly. So the same philosophy can be applied, back off and give them a chance to get this thing off the ground. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Amen Brother George!!
I think we all need to slow down a bit when we read these posts and make sure we read them for what they are saying or asking and not for what we THINK they are. Kelly |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Well said KELLY and GEORGE!!!!!
Gentlepersons, there is no need to be insulting in our Forums. Furthermore, you will find that as the ALL POWERFUL ADMIN OF OZ... I have deleted your posts that contain insults. There was absolutely no value in either of them, or I would have edited them.
Please, when you answer a post... as KELLY requests so nicely... read it carefully. The original question on this Thread is not where this stuff should have been hammered on. ALWAYS start a new thread when you have something new to say. Posting "very different" content under an existing Thread (with its focused TITLE) hides what you are saying from other users/visitors. When you start a new Thread, it becomes visible. Please... use good judgement on posting under a Thread... AND... avoid making insults under all conditions. I know danny_g and mikedombrowski both and they are respectable fellows. Let's keep it that way!!! To answer danny_g's question... either NTFS or FAT32 will work fine. We ship and recommend NTFS as it is superior, more modern, and faster. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
now to answer the question with a simple method-
I took all my discs and alphabetized them and then listed all of them on a sheet of paper before setting up the ids. I then numbered the discs and created the id's with those numbers. so if I were able to import my cd's via 2 or more computers, I could just split those up and start the id's on those computers at the first number I set up before hand. If MTU set up the files to be account# oriented then it might work. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What's an account#
![]() I'd like to answer, but I'm clueless what you are asking.... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ????????
Quote:
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Danny,
Don't they already have that covered in the ID that's assigned to the purchaser's computer? My understanding is that the ID will not work on another pc, so it wouldn't matter if the program were copied to another pc and an attempt made to execute it with the ID number or not. George |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I mentioned this in an earlier forum (maybe this thread).
When I bought my Hoster license & laptop, I was told that a second license to the same user would be at a reduced rate. I won't quote that rate because it was very cheap. Officially, What is the cost to add Hoster to a second computer? In order to think about splitting the importing load between 2 computers (besides combining songlists etc.) you would obviously need to have Hoster on more than 1 PC. I would like to set up a second system within the next week and need to know the cost of a second license? Wayne |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|