MTU.Community

MTU.Community (http://forum.mtu.com/index.php)
-   Hoster Help (http://forum.mtu.com/forumdisplay.php?f=71)
-   -   hoster disc id# (http://forum.mtu.com/showthread.php?t=1532)

mikedomi November 12th, 2002 06:12 PM

hoster disc id#
 
:r think about this .for the dj/kj that have more than one system if you own two sets of disc or you buy two or more hoster to impeg faster you have a problem. the problem is hoster is not set up to combine two hard drives to make one .it has no way to pick up dup id number and give you the chance to change the id # in the kma file . so when you rebuild the data base you don't screw up all that work you have done. if you have 1000 disc and your lucky enough to do 5 an hour and you dont have the time to do this your self . and you can find some to do this for you .lets say for 10.00 an hour you do the math sure is a lot of money to spend so you dont have to carry your disc around .look mtu has done a great job with a new baby. but kjs have to back of with things like key change and let them focus on more important things like data base and multiple hard drive fuction.do you really want to spend 250 hours do 1 set of disc thank you mike

kedmison November 13th, 2002 08:24 AM

Song Book Question
 
I have finally ordered the laptop and Hoster. Have been giving lot's of thought to what changes I will have to make from the 4oo disc player to the laptop and the idea of song numbers came to mind. With Hoster there will no longer be a need for Disc # 6 Track # 11, etc. What numbering system have those of you who have made the switch gone with?



Kelly

Beavis November 13th, 2002 10:39 AM

you can choose between book i.d. (single number) and your method.

mikedomi November 13th, 2002 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BEAVIS
you can choose between book i.d. (single number) and your method.
hi i under stand that .the point i am trying to make is if you are impeging on more than 1 computer when you go to move your files to one .and you make a mistake and duplcate a number you will screw up your data base.and 2 was the time factor of useing only 1 comp. it would be nice if hoster would find this mistake and let you know before it happens.no one has a lot of time .so we need to be able to work on more then 1 compt. to cut your time in 1/2 or by1/3 time is money.

mikedomi November 13th, 2002 01:26 PM

Re: Song Book Question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by kedmison
I have finally ordered the laptop and Hoster. Have been giving lot's of thought to what changes I will have to make from the 4oo disc player to the laptop and the idea of song numbers came to mind. With Hoster there will no longer be a need for Disc # 6 Track # 11, etc. What numbering system have those of you who have made the switch gone with?



Kelly

just keep this in mind singers know there songs by manf. and disc # what are you going to do when some one picks a song .you call them up song starts and they say thats not the one i want. then you have to stop go to the next singer and find the one they want .with both in your book than there is no mistake. have a great day

kedmison November 15th, 2002 02:00 PM

NTFS/FAT32
 
Those of you who are using Hoster with XP Pro; Is it best to use the new NTFS or stay with the FAT32?


Kelly

danny_g November 15th, 2002 02:32 PM

I don't know if I am interpretting this wrong or not but it seems the originator of this thread is asking about sharing songfiles between computers- my understanding of the hoster program is that the songs loaded onto one computer are not transferable to a second as that would allow a karaoke hosting company to utilize one set of discs in multiple machines which is a violation of copyright laws if I understand them at all. From what I understand one original disc- one copy with the original disc stored somewhere so it can't used in another system. Please MTUSUPPORT correct me if I am wrong. but I don't think I am as I have a buddy of mine who went through the ASCAP inspection to make sure he wasn't using more than one copy in all his systems.

ADMIN NOTE: Hoster does not prevent recording songs under one Hoster and copying those songs to another disc. We made the decision not to play Karaoke Kops as everyone else in the world seems to try to be doing that. Yes, it is illegal to run more shows at the same time than you have disc copies. Thus, you should always make sure you have the same number of discs as copies of Hoster running their imported songs.

MikeD is talking about (FYI impeging = importing) importing half a disc set on one computer with Hoster, and the other half on a second. Then copying the songs from both to the alternate discs. THIS WILL WORK!!! All it takes is spend about 10 seconds to say the first import person uses BookID from 1 to 1000 and the second person use 1001 to 2000 (or anything but 1 to 1000!!!). Then, when you run the "Rebuild Song Database" function it will locate all .kma files and there will not be any duplicate BookIDs.

This is not a bug, but a user request that we could make a bit more automated, but right now is not worth the time investment. It only takes a user 10 seconds to prevent this problem. Sorry we did not think of this earlier, but you guys are very creative!!!

mikedomi November 15th, 2002 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by danny_g
I don't know if I am interpretting this wrong or not but it seems the originator of this thread is asking about sharing songfiles between computers- my understanding of the hoster program is that the songs loaded onto one computer are not transferable to a second as that would allow a karaoke hosting company to utilize one set of discs in multiple machines which is a violation of copyright laws if I understand them at all. From what I understand one original disc- one copy with the original disc stored somewhere so it can't used in another system. Please MTUSUPPORT correct me if I am wrong. but I don't think I am as I have a buddy of mine who went through the ASCAP inspection to make sure he wasn't using more than one copy in all his systems.
TO DANNY G YOU ARE SO FAR OF BASE IT IS NOT FUNNY .THIS IS FOR THE PEOPLE WHO BUY MORE THAN 1COPY OF HOSTER WHO OWN 1,2,3,4,5 ORG COPY OF DISC YOU HAVE ,2,3,4 SHOWS GOING ON AT 1 TIME WHO DONT HAVE THE TIME TO SPEND THERE LIFE IN FRONT OF A D## COMPT.WHO SPENT $30.000 IN DISC AND DONT WANT TO SPEND ANOTHER $2000 TO PUT IT IN EACH 1 NOW!!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE POINT.

Beavis November 15th, 2002 04:13 PM

this is why i asked mtu for a converting tool that can be run more than one time. or a tool that would scan your hard disk for .kma files.

danny_g November 20th, 2002 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mikedombroski
YOU STILL DONT GET IT . SO I WILL SPEAK SLOW!!!!. for starters i am not even in the kj profession iam a system builder and lets try this one more time .for people who HAVE 2 sets of manf. disc they are intitled to have 2 hoster. but why should they have to take the time to Put it in twice.if you cant understand this I HOPE YOU DONT DRIVE A CAR OR OWU A GUN BECAUSE IF YOU DO WE ARE ALL IN TROUBLE. WILL SOME ONE PLEASE TRY TO HELP THIS MAN HE JUST CANT GET IT . NO ONE HERE IS TALKING ABOUT BREAKING THE LAW . YOU ARE JUST HAVE TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING RED IS RED AND BLACK IS BLACK. IF YOU HAVE DK 1-99 AND YOU OWN 2 SETS WHY CANT YOU PUT 1-50 ON ONE 51-99 ON THE OTHER AT THE SAME TIME TO SAVE TIME. THEN COMBINE THEM TO MAKE 1 THIS IS NOT !!!!BREAKING THE LAW.IF THIS IS TO HARD TO UNDERSTAND MAYBE YOU SHOULD GIVE BACK YOUR DRIVERS PERMENT. FOR THE REST OF YOU I AM SORRY YOU HAD TO READ THIS .DANNY G. YOU SHOULD NOT ACCUSE SOME ONE OF BREAKING THE LAW.THAT IS ILLEGAL
Ok Ok I get it this time. I apologize for accusing anyone was just interpreting a couple of posts that Admin made and specs that were listed. was having a very bad day and took it out on you and I apologize for that. I was just trying to say that so far MTU's Hoster is the only program out there that keeps its files secure from giving to pirates that are keeping the pay rate down where I am. I would rather be making $150 to $250 a show instead I'm having to accept jobs for barely $100 a show.

kedmison November 20th, 2002 03:20 PM

Miscomunications
 
Danny_g,

I think what got this whole thing stirred up was my question about the difference between NTFS (XP Pro) and (XP Pro)FAT32. The file system its self. I am wanting to give my home computer over to my wife for her to use and network my MTU laptop with hoster, when I'm not KJing so I can still use the home computer and not put anything extra on the laptop. I felt it important for them both to be utilizing the same file system; NOT sharing hoster files. Clear as mud???:g

Kelly

George November 20th, 2002 03:36 PM

Been watching with more than a bit of amusement, and it all brings up a question in my mind. If MIKEDOMBROWSKI is not a kj, then why all the controversy to begin with? Haven't seen anybody that's going to be using the program concerned about this point.

I agree with MIKEDOMBROWSKI that MTU needs to be focusing on the important points, rather that something simple like key change that can come later, but also have enough faith in MTU to believe that they have sense enough to know there are going to be multiple users out there who will have this problem, and will have a solution very shortly. So the same philosophy can be applied, back off and give them a chance to get this thing off the ground.


kedmison November 20th, 2002 04:41 PM

Amusement
 
Amen Brother George!!


I think we all need to slow down a bit when we read these posts and make sure we read them for what they are saying or asking and not for what we THINK they are.

Kelly

admin November 22nd, 2002 02:02 PM

Well said KELLY and GEORGE!!!!!
 
Gentlepersons, there is no need to be insulting in our Forums. Furthermore, you will find that as the ALL POWERFUL ADMIN OF OZ... I have deleted your posts that contain insults. There was absolutely no value in either of them, or I would have edited them.

Please, when you answer a post... as KELLY requests so nicely... read it carefully. The original question on this Thread is not where this stuff should have been hammered on.

ALWAYS start a new thread when you have something new to say. Posting "very different" content under an existing Thread (with its focused TITLE) hides what you are saying from other users/visitors. When you start a new Thread, it becomes visible. Please... use good judgement on posting under a Thread... AND... avoid making insults under all conditions. I know danny_g and mikedombrowski both and they are respectable fellows. Let's keep it that way!!!

To answer danny_g's question... either NTFS or FAT32 will work fine. We ship and recommend NTFS as it is superior, more modern, and faster.

danny_g November 22nd, 2002 03:41 PM

now to answer the question with a simple method-
I took all my discs and alphabetized them and then listed all of them on a sheet of paper before setting up the ids.
I then numbered the discs and created the id's with those numbers. so if I were able to import my cd's via 2 or more computers, I could just split those up and start the id's on those computers at the first number I set up before hand. If MTU set up the files to be account# oriented then it might work.

admin November 22nd, 2002 05:11 PM

????????
 
What's an account# :?

I'd like to answer, but I'm clueless what you are asking....

danny_g November 23rd, 2002 10:25 AM

Re: ????????
 
Quote:

Originally posted by admin
What's an account# :?

I'd like to answer, but I'm clueless what you are asking....

Customer # or something like that. have it coded into the wma the Email address used to purchase hoster and it will only play if it the player played on it has that same email address or customer number coded in it when it is registered. If they try to share the files with another person it will not play.

George November 23rd, 2002 10:55 AM

Hi Danny,
Don't they already have that covered in the ID that's assigned to the purchaser's computer? My understanding is that the ID will not work on another pc, so it wouldn't matter if the program were copied to another pc and an attempt made to execute it with the ID number or not.

George

Wayne White November 23rd, 2002 11:44 AM

To Admin
 
I mentioned this in an earlier forum (maybe this thread).

When I bought my Hoster license & laptop, I was told that a second license to the same user would be at a reduced rate. I won't quote that rate because it was very cheap.

Officially, What is the cost to add Hoster to a second computer?

In order to think about splitting the importing load between 2 computers (besides combining songlists etc.) you would obviously need to have Hoster on more than 1 PC.

I would like to set up a second system within the next week and need to know the cost of a second license?

Wayne

danny_g November 24th, 2002 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by George
Hi Danny,
Don't they already have that covered in the ID that's assigned to the purchaser's computer? My understanding is that the ID will not work on another pc, so it wouldn't matter if the program were copied to another pc and an attempt made to execute it with the ID number or not.

George

Tyrannosoft has their propriatory KMF files so that if you run the same program on 2 computers as long as your Customer user # matches you can share between 2 computers you own. it's not locked into the activation code itself. If a buddy was to copy your KMF's onto his computer it will not play because the User ID#'s do not match and you get this message: KMF not registered to this computer. I tested this out by taking a regisetered KMF and copying it to cdr wiping out the origianl KMF off my computer and reintroduced the file back into my computer and it worked so I now have a faster way to reload my system if something happens to it rather than just reinmport the files I can just reload my KMF's into the computer.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2009 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are copyrighted by Micro Technology Unlimited, 2000-2008. Use of any material from these Forums is prohibited without written agreement from MTU.