Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockrz
Ever notice how some songs have a few lyrics that are wrong, or where the music has sections that are a little different from the original version?
This is what karaoke companies do when an artist (or their publisher) refuses to give authorization for their songs to be made into karaoke.
Supposedly, this is perfectly legal when a certain percentage of the song/ music is different from the original.
I heard this years ago, and there's gotta be some truth to it, otherwise why would karaoke companies make some songs with what most people would call errors due to being considerably different from the original.
I heard this from somebody who claimed to be good friends with a studio musician who has worked for Sound Choice on numerous projects where they planned to make sections of certain songs to be different than the originals.
Anybody ever hear about this?
|
I have heard this but I do not believe it to be true.
Case in point:Parodies. If you look at the credits for parodies they will include the original song writers names as well as the parody writer. I believe also that there has to be substantial changes to a song before someone can add their name to the credits and share the royalties. If a song has the "look and feel" of another song, the original writers (or owners if the rights have been sold) will get credit
The movie industry is getting sued all the time over these things. Someone thinks that a new movie is too similiar to a book or screenplay they wrote and will sue, leaving it up to the courts to decide if a work is new or a derivative of someone elses.