![]() |
|
Hoster Help Post Hoster questions, tips and suggestions here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hey Joe. When MTU added the Singer Database to Hoster 4 in the early beta stages, the suggestion was made to have "Venue" or "Club" added for reason #1. I think this is common for Pro karaoke hosts. I agree that this feature would make it easier for a karaoke host to keep the Singer Database straight but as it is, the Singer Database is VERY workable. ![]() ![]() The main purpose of the Singer Database for me, is to get the songs on the playlist as fast a possible. As it is, the Singer Database does this. Maybe we'll see "Venue' or "Club" added down the road. Maybe this should be posted in the 'New Feature" section of the forum as well? I hope this helps. Jim ![]()
__________________
![]() http://madjim.com http://www.myspace.com/madjimhall http://www.youtube.com/madjimhall Test Comp #1: P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM * XP Home SP3 * IE8 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Onboard Sound * Onboard Video * * * MTU Rack (Show Computer) * P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM* XP Home SP3 * IE7 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Sound Blaster PCI-512 * ATI Raydeon 9200 Last edited by madjim- with the Lord; October 9th, 2008 at 01:48 PM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The main purpose of the Singer Database for me, is to get the songs on the playlist as fast a possible. As it is, the Singer Database does this. Maybe we'll see "Venue' or "Club" added down the road. Maybe this should be posted in the 'New Feature" section of the forum as well?
Jim, Your right, unless you get a singer with 50 or more songs in their database, then the refresh rate is way slow (sic). I generally will use the singer database for the initial playlist setup at the beginning of the show, I will then use signup slips and book ID's ( I know you are paperless ) to get the list updated without waiting for singers database to refresh every time I click on another tab, or switching between singer's databases. Not a big inconvenience at this time, plus I have songslips to backup the rotation, in case Hoster 4.xx freezes, graphics lag, computer crashes.... and 3.4 loses all the changes after the initial playlist! ![]() ![]() Rick Rikki Tikki Karaoke |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Rick,
As my Singer Database has grown, I have to agree with you about the refreshing issue. I personally believe that MTU would have done more with the Singer Database but there were just too many big fish that needed frying, so to speak. For me, since Hoster 4.05 (and all past versions) does not freeze, does not go out of sync and does not crash I don't have to use paper or a board to keep rotation. If everybody could run their show with my rig, we wouldn't see any negative posts against Hoster 4.XX but this just ain't gonna happen. There are too many factors to concider. Your suggestion is great for those who still use paper which is the majority according to the "Are You Numberless/Paperless" poll. Thanks again Rick! Jim ![]() P.S. If you want to Quote someone, hit the Quote button in the bottom right of the post. Just edit out what you don't want to include in the quote.
__________________
![]() http://madjim.com http://www.myspace.com/madjimhall http://www.youtube.com/madjimhall Test Comp #1: P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM * XP Home SP3 * IE8 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Onboard Sound * Onboard Video * * * MTU Rack (Show Computer) * P4 3GHz * 3gb RAM* XP Home SP3 * IE7 * WMP11 * NF3.5 * Sound Blaster PCI-512 * ATI Raydeon 9200 Last edited by madjim- with the Lord; October 9th, 2008 at 03:11 PM. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Bryant
I use last initails on almost all common names as you will see new ppl come in eventually with the same names as the "charter member" regulars. I also used this but after a while you can't remember all of this detail on every singer especially if it's crowded and people coming at you left and right . I have a lot going on and don't need the added task of thinking is this one in my database at this club or not and by the way most people just bring there ticket to the stage and there off so I just que from the ticket and don't bother to much with the singer database. If it had this feature then I would use it all the time. Don't get me wrong it's a go Idea if your working two, three four locations. I just went back to what I was doing before, setup a list for that club and save as club cavana or something and use it when i'm there. I'll keep on using what has been reliably accurate and not mush fussing around with. Thx Joe..... |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Bob jo Bob sn Tom Jo Tom sn I works well, I have lots of names in the singers list..Good customers who follow me from place to place get a different designator.
__________________
Laddie Test Machine: Win 7 Home Prem. Toshiba Satellite A306, Intel 2G Duel Core processor( 64 bit), 4G Memory, ATI Mobility Radion HD3650 w/512MB Secondary Test Machine:Supermicro X5DA8 Desktop,XP Professional Service Pack 3 (build 2600),3.07 Gig Intel Xeon (2 installed), 3G Memory, ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Rick Rikki Tikki Karaoke |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Laddie Test Machine: Win 7 Home Prem. Toshiba Satellite A306, Intel 2G Duel Core processor( 64 bit), 4G Memory, ATI Mobility Radion HD3650 w/512MB Secondary Test Machine:Supermicro X5DA8 Desktop,XP Professional Service Pack 3 (build 2600),3.07 Gig Intel Xeon (2 installed), 3G Memory, ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thank you for your input on this, but as a practical matter lets say you make a play list in club 'A" then club "B", then C, D, E, F and so on that list would get very time comsuming after a while to find that specific name and then code as per you're example ( Not Knocking It ) I just want to make a point. Now what I'm using is the playList bring up a new playList cleanSlate and start populating that list with singers request and your own song list for that club you can easily get 60 to 75 songs in one night 4hr show & more on 5hr's. Now you play five locations X 60 Min = 300 Lines of information that has to be sorted out by your computer and your eyes ( By the end of the night you cauld have a hard-eyes crash ). Now when your able to orginize that one location by that 4hr to 5hr show that = to 60 to 75 Max of information for your computer and your eyes to sort out and find. Question which one is better? Thx Joe...... |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I always do 60 plus songs a night. It never been a problem. ![]()
__________________
Laddie Test Machine: Win 7 Home Prem. Toshiba Satellite A306, Intel 2G Duel Core processor( 64 bit), 4G Memory, ATI Mobility Radion HD3650 w/512MB Secondary Test Machine:Supermicro X5DA8 Desktop,XP Professional Service Pack 3 (build 2600),3.07 Gig Intel Xeon (2 installed), 3G Memory, ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote: laddie
I start with a clean list for each show and populate it as I go. Don't really see the difference. I use the singers DB to speed things up. When you type tom, all the toms drop down ,pick the correct one and your done. I always do 60 plus songs a night. It never been a problem. ![]() Hi laddie Now you play five locations X 60 Min = 300 Lines of information that has to be sorted out by your computer and your eyes. Now when your able to orginize that one location by that 4hr to 5hr show that = to 60 to 75 Max of information for your computer and your eyes to sort out and find. This example is for five locations how bout 15 to 25 locations. Do you see any benefit with this? Thx Joe.... |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My wife assigns (populates) half her list as she watches who attends at the beginning, and adds quickly from there. Again, let's keep this simple as it is now.
__________________
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|