4.06 issues including out of sync on XP

[bryant]

Originally Posted by ddouglass;
[B

The 3.4 version was included while they were struggling through all the Vista problems and getting the new Hoster setup to work with it (and XP) correctly. I would not look for it to be included much longer.[/b]

Dale,
My question would be will those that have it now still have it to use as backup or will future upgrades delete it entirely?
Bryant

[ddouglass]

Bryant you are asking the wrong person. I have no idea.

[bryant]

Originally Posted by ddouglass

Bryant you are asking the wrong person. I have no idea.

I asked because you seem to have knowledge that it was no longer soon to be available.

[Skybird74]

Originally Posted by bryant

Dale,
My question would be will those that have it now still have it to use as backup or will future upgrades delete it entirely?
Bryant

It was suggested in earlier posts, to keep 3.321, just in case 3.4 is not included in future releases. Just about everyone was happy with it before 4.0x upgrades & Vista issues.

[capnvic]

Originally Posted by Skybird74

It was suggested in earlier posts, to keep 3.321, just in case 3.4 is not included in future releases. Just about everyone was happy with it before 4.0x upgrades & Vista issues.

You could also keep a version of 3.40 on hold for the meantime as well....just stash a version of 4.0x somewhere.However, I would think that whatever future product features come out from MTU should be well tested....

[ddouglass]

The only problem with that is you would have to re-install it online which means it can't be used on the fly as 3.4 can. When it is taken out I am sure you should not need it again anyway. I have not had to use it since installing 4.06. I think everyone has gotten to the point of relying on it like a crutch. Even older versions of Hoster used to glitch out once in a while for either internal or external problem. All we did then was restart Hoster or restart the computer and press on. Now with every little problem we switch over to 3.4 because 4.0x or the OS hiccuped (as KarenK put it). To bad the Vista users don't have XP to fall back on, eh

[capnvic]

Originally Posted by ddouglass

The only problem with that is you would have to re-install it online which means it can't be used on the fly as 3.4 can. When it is taken out I am sure you should not need it again anyway. I have not had to use it since installing 4.06. I think everyone has gotten to the point of relying on it like a crutch. Even older versions of Hoster used to glitch out once in a while for either internal or external problem. All we did then was restart Hoster or restart the computer and press on. Now with every little problem we switch over to 3.4 because 4.0x or the OS hiccuped (as KarenK put it). To bad the Vista users don't have XP to fall back on, eh

But Vista users could if they really wanted. You can install XP with the Vista Product Key, and it is authorized by MS. Although they don't make a point of advertising it...As for 4.06 It works fine for me too, so I am in agreement that you shouldn't be reliant on 3.221 or 3.4.

[capnvic]

Originally Posted by capnvic

But Vista users could if they really wanted. You can install XP with the Vista Product Key, and it is authorized by MS. Although they don't make a point of advertising it...As for 4.06 It works fine for me too, so I am in agreement that you shouldn't be reliant on 3.221 or 3.4.

maybe I'll just say very little and kibbutz for awhile...Problem with me doing this at work, when I should be working!

[ddouglass]

Originally Posted by capnvic

But Vista users could if they really wanted. You can install XP with the Vista Product Key, and it is authorized by MS. Although they don't make a point of advertising it...As for 4.06 It works fine for me too, so I am in agreement that you shouldn't be reliant on 3.221 or 3.4.

However that doesn't allow them to use one then switch to the other imediately as 3.4 does.

[bryant]

Originally Posted by Skybird74

It was suggested in earlier posts, to keep 3.321, just in case 3.4 is not included in future releases. Just about everyone was happy with it before 4.0x upgrades & Vista issues.

But it would cost an extra install, as my show computer has already used its upgrade from 3.321 to 4.06.

[Skybird74]

Originally Posted by bryant

But it would cost an extra install, as my show computer has already used its upgrade from 3.321 to 4.06.

Bryan, I only suggested this to people who are still afraid of 4.06 and even more afraid that the next upgrade (4.1) will not include 3.4. So, if a laptop with 4.0x crashed & a person became completely terrified of running 4.0x at a Show...... then they could always run their backup with 3.321 ...... (kinda like a security blanket)

[bryant]

Originally Posted by Skybird74

Bryan, I only suggested this to people who are still afraid of 4.06 and even more afraid that the next upgrade (4.1) will not include 3.4. So, if a laptop with 4.0x crashed & a person became completely terrified of running 4.0x at a Show...... then they could always run their backup with 3.321 ...... (kinda like a security blanket)

ahhh, right, I see. Good idea.

[admin]

Originally Posted by bryant

Dale,
My question would be will those that have it now still have it to use as backup or will future upgrades delete it entirely?
Bryant

We don't have a hard reason to remove 3.40 for some time.

psinkiws, you wrote a book!

It will take some time to process all your points. Dale D has done a great job on some of them.

As to the right clicking to edit, if you think about it, if we kept left click as we did before, you couldn't click-n-drag a track up/down the Playlist like you can now. We also changed the order of the fields in each track in the Playlist to meet user demands, including our Beta Testers. No, right clicking is not explicit (intuitive). It does require reading in the manual. I hope I made it clear early in the manual. I'll check it and change it if not.