![]() |
|
Hoster Help Post Hoster questions, tips and suggestions here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Please reconsider what is really important here. Moving forward with this software to continue to be a market leader in the field of karaoke. I, for one, have gambled my entire financial future on the business of karaoke. I will stand behind MTU because I believe they will always be the market leader in karaoke software and I have a quarter million dollar investment in my bar that is tied to that. If I am willing to risk that, don't you think that I would be the first one to bitch if I thought this was not going to work itself out? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
another suggestion for home use is to get one of those mic's that has 2,000 or more songs in it for $300, then maybe you wouldnt have any problems, you're just gonna get a sound that it looks like you're singing under a bridge..but if you want to be a professional kj use mtu's product.. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Over the past 10 years I’ve purchased (brand new for home use only) over 500 CDGs (incl SC Foundation 1, 2 & the 5 Bricks) , a number of Karaoke Video CDs, two JVC triple tray players, Peavey PA gear incl SP5G speakers, Shure SM58s (corded and wireless), Sennheiser E835s etc. Over that time I’ve made some mistakes in terms of ‘brand’ selection and have learned from those mistakes. Two years ago, after considerable research, I purchased the entire suite of MTU products (Hoster, Microstudio, Songverter, Vogone and KHPro) and have continued to upgrade to all of the current MTU versions during that time. My point is that all MTU customers (both Home User & KJ/Pro customers) pay the same purchase price and share the same expectations in terms of product performance and reliability. The key difference between Home User and KJ/Pro is the fact that for the Home User it’s a hobby and for the KJ/Pro it’s a living. However MTU products appeal to and are used by a broad customer base. MTU has a history of improving and innovating their great products and, along with this forum, provides great support. I'll continue to support them. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
i am not assuming anything, i myself invested a lot of money for home used, i bought 4 mackie boards ( 2 dfx6, 1 cfx 12 and 1 dfx 12 ) 2 mackie active srm 450 speakers 4 active krk studio monitors ( 2 rokit 6 limited editon, 2 rp-8 and a 10" sub.) 4 mic's ( 2 audix and 2 audio technica wireless ) cd/vcd player, a dell pc with lcd monitor ( i use microstudio for home ) 1/2 of them is in my garage ( converted into a small studio ) the other 1/2 is in my family room, all i'm saying was for people that wanted to used hoster for home, get something simple, " hoster is a serious" software and mtu is working theire butts of trying to give most of us asked /wanted....and by the way i have 4 3 way jbls and 4 1-18" sub. for sale if anybody's interested
![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by billyo; August 16th, 2008 at 08:50 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I have typically just use the PC I retired at the house to run Hoster on (originally a 700mhz Duron processor with 128 megs of ram). After a clean minimum install of XP, I go online, update Windows and install Hoster. It takes a LOT less resources than Photoshop, or Video editing software that you would typically have on a home PC, making that old computer a perfect candidate for use as a dedicated karaoke machine. The PC I am using currently, I picked up at an office sale for $50. I put another $75 in a video card and a stick of ram and BINGO, I have a rock solid karaoke system to protect all my CDGs. I would expect to pay more than that for cases just to cart the CDGs around in. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
God bless the Beta testers, and God bless 3.4X!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
IMHO Sam |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I have not upgraded as my 1st clue was bundling 3.4 with 4.0.
My 2nd clue was the 2 years it took to get 4.0 and seeing the list of improvements that had nothing to do with making it any easier to get a song into the playlist. 2 years...and all that was accomplished was to change the format of the SND (which is the ONLY improvement that the SINGERS see)? 2 years...and I add a BookID and a Singer's name to the Playlist in the EXACT same way prior to 4.0 (Am I STILL typing the SAME Singer's Name into the Playlist OVER AND OVER again)? 2 years...and the Playlist looks EXACTLY the same? 2 years...and there is NO DRAG AND DROP? My 3rd clue was the "reduced" upgrade price for "loyal" customers. As stated perfectly in another Post, the customers are not Beta testers and, I will add, not guinea pigs. MTU has missed the mark and I will wait patiently until they do hit the mark. Last edited by gd123; August 17th, 2008 at 07:55 PM. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|