![]() |
|
Songverter Help Post Songverter questions, tips and suggestions here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quality of sound and compression is very close to the same, so as you said use wma+g for now and wait to see if MTU can set up the kma option.
__________________
Dale Douglass 2nd Generation Karaoke I am not a member of the MTU Staff.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Good Advice
Yeah I probably won't put off re-importing my library until the file naming issue is changed, if it is. It's early in my thread, but noone has definitively said that KMA was higher quality than WMA/cdg. Frankly I think mp3g sounds very good, but I'm trying to go by the word of people with more sophisticated ears and machines. So I don't want to regret things later on when I get more sophisticated machinery etc. If the naming option for KMA is changed, I'm assuming I can always convert to that without any loss.
So it looks like I have a lot of work to do ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I thought kma and wma+g were exactly the same except for the added header information. I know kma's are based on wma audio so it should sound the same.
Sam
__________________
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That's what I figured by golly!!
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The difference is kma has graphics embedded and wma doesn't so has an additional file.
__________________
Dale Douglass 2nd Generation Karaoke I am not a member of the MTU Staff.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dale it looks like you were correct.
This is from another thread where Lonman posed a similiar question about a year ago. Quote:
__________________
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanx.
__________________
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|