![]() |
|
Hoster Help Post Hoster questions, tips and suggestions here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Are KMA files better than Zip, mp3g, etc?
Hoster is capable of importing & playing a plethora of karaoke file types.
What benefits - if any - are there to KMA files compared to all the other file types? Not sure whether this subject has been raised before but thought it might be of interest to other users.
__________________
MikeP Test Computer 1. Medion PC Win 10 Home Name: MedionWin8-PC Processor AMD A8-5500 APU with Radeon HD Graphics 3.20 Ghz 8Gb Ram 64bit OS 2. MEDION P7612 Windows 10 Home Name Mike_P7612_17in Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6500 @ 2.10GHz, 2100 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s) (RAM)4.00 GB http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/michael.pyne1 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Are KMA files better than Zip, mp3g, etc?
I personally can't see any advantage now days in kma types. When Hoster was first introduced hard drive space was at a premium especially with a laptop. When ripping direct from disc the kma format would rip to wma format which at the same compression as mp3 would supposedly give a better audio quality. In those days you were probably talking about 96k rips. With todays terabyte hard drives the need to compress so much is no longer a problem, I import all my CD+G now at 320k zip format which far exceeds the previous quality. Not only that mp3 or zip format can be used in most other audio software, kma is basically limited to MTU products and would need converting to be able to use in any other product.
__________________
Roy. Test Laptop: Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit. Acer Aspire 5738G Intel core 2 Duo T6600 ATI Graphics 500Mb dedicated. 4Gb Memory 500 Gb SSD Drive. K-lite Mega version 1205 Show Backup: Windows 10 Acer Aspire Touch Screen V15, Intel core i5, Iris Graphics 6100 up to 8277mb dynamic video, 16Gb memory, 1 TB hybrid HDD. K-lite Mega pac. Show Computer: Windows 10, Dell Inspiron 15 7000, CPU I7-855OU, Ram 8GB, Graphics UHD620 + Nvidea GeForce 940MX, Hard Drive SSD 256GB + 1GB internal. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are KMA files better than Zip, mp3g, etc?
Thanks Roy - you have confirmed what I thought too.
I agree with you re Kma files being limited to MTU products only - in the same way as Ots files are limited to theirs. I will reorganize all my files along the lines you have outlined. I have also moved them to a central NAS server to reduce unnecessary duplication.
__________________
MikeP Test Computer 1. Medion PC Win 10 Home Name: MedionWin8-PC Processor AMD A8-5500 APU with Radeon HD Graphics 3.20 Ghz 8Gb Ram 64bit OS 2. MEDION P7612 Windows 10 Home Name Mike_P7612_17in Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6500 @ 2.10GHz, 2100 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s) (RAM)4.00 GB http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/michael.pyne1 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are KMA files better than Zip, mp3g, etc?
All my songs are imported as KMA files at bit rate 192. Would it behoove me to re import them as say mp3g at a higher rate? And what would be the simplest way to do so?
Kelly |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are KMA files better than Zip, mp3g, etc?
MTU Songverter is all you need to convert kma to mp3&g. It also allows you to convert at 192 bit rate. There are lots of other formats that it can convert from and to also. A great little program! You can convert all your files as a batch. I successfully converted 40,000. I was also trying to eliminate a lot of duplicate files, so I converted my Kma files to (mp3&g) zip files.
__________________
MikeP Test Computer 1. Medion PC Win 10 Home Name: MedionWin8-PC Processor AMD A8-5500 APU with Radeon HD Graphics 3.20 Ghz 8Gb Ram 64bit OS 2. MEDION P7612 Windows 10 Home Name Mike_P7612_17in Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6500 @ 2.10GHz, 2100 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s) (RAM)4.00 GB http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/michael.pyne1 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Are KMA files better than Zip, mp3g, etc?
Quote:
The only way you can improve on that bitrate is by re importing them direct from the disc as the later versions of Hoster allow importing at 320 rate. If you imported them from mp3+g files originally then they will only be as good as the original mp3 rate that you imported them from. As to "Would it behoove me to re import them" is a matter for you to decide if the difference is noticeable to you then perhaps worth it. Why not import one disk at 320k as a zip format give it a false Disc Id so as not to cause duplicated Id's then play them back to back to see if you think the difference is worth it. You can always delete it afterwards if you decide against.
__________________
Roy. Test Laptop: Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit. Acer Aspire 5738G Intel core 2 Duo T6600 ATI Graphics 500Mb dedicated. 4Gb Memory 500 Gb SSD Drive. K-lite Mega version 1205 Show Backup: Windows 10 Acer Aspire Touch Screen V15, Intel core i5, Iris Graphics 6100 up to 8277mb dynamic video, 16Gb memory, 1 TB hybrid HDD. K-lite Mega pac. Show Computer: Windows 10, Dell Inspiron 15 7000, CPU I7-855OU, Ram 8GB, Graphics UHD620 + Nvidea GeForce 940MX, Hard Drive SSD 256GB + 1GB internal. Last edited by Roy Dennis; May 6th, 2015 at 06:53 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks for the info Mike & Roy!
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|