[RIKKI TIKKI]

Originally Posted by Musicman51

As i stated, preception is 99.99999% % of the game.
George, you are correct in stating that everyone will have their own perception of what & how SC is going about protecting their business.

I have read every single posting on this forum on this matter, and i haven't read anything that says sound choice doesn't have a right to pursue their property. No disagreement there. Again..preception.

I agree... although it is your right to form an opinion, whether in agreement or discontent.


Simply not true. Many innocent individuals have been faulsly accused, a few have had their suits dropped. Not one, not one single apology to these individuals by the sleps. Right now, if i were in virginia, and i owned a bar, and a kj asked me to start up karaoke, what do you think i would say to him? Already there is a 20% drop in available karaoke night spots in virginia already. have legitimate kj's doing business as usual? where? Sir, you are naive.

Naive... probably true, but we all have the same industry to protect, if we want to perpetuate the Karaoke business, that we all stand to lose, if piracy or bootlegging is allowed to prosper, and don't police our own...


NOT....and heres a news flash for ya. Neither are the majority of crooks. Concerned? of course. Not about the legality issue. But of the manner sound choice is using, costing a loss of jobs, and ruining the reputation of legal kj's. Sound choice does not want a single case to go to trial. They are in this for the money, and they have demostrated, they don't care who gets injustly accused. It is cheaper for an accused legal kj to settle, then to pursue his innocents, and reputation. Sound choice is counting on this.

I'm sure you are correct on this assumption, simple warning labels, and chain letters, wouldn't stop the mass production of bootleggers, or the illegal sharing by ignorant KJ's, or the purchase of that unlicensed copy of the Eagles cdg. They (SC) have drawn a line in the sand, and I am not so sure that they are not prepared to go to court if and when the cases involved justify a court action to recoup any perceived lost revenue. There will be some innocent KJ's involved, who should be able to satisfy the court. "Innocent until proven guilty", if you choose to take the stand in your defense. We all have the right to a fair trial, and face our accuser.

I personally don't own that many sound choice disc. I will say they are actually no better then chartbuster, music maestro or pocket songs. They do the job. However, sound choice does not pay anymore for rights to a song, studio time, duplicating, recording gear, musicians then chartbuster, or any of the other top karaoke manus. And the other CDG manufactures have something sound choice no longer has now. Thats class, and respect of the karaoke community. This is of their own choosing...sadly

This is sounding more like a KIA {A} form letter the more i read it and reply to this.

Your stance on the K.I.A. {A} is documented and understood... I think their purpose has been more than slightly misconstrued, and with their teaming up with Sound Choice, Stellar, the Sleps, etc. has poisoned the effect that an internal "Karaoke Police" could have in helping to straighten out the business end for the legitimate KJ's.

Sound Choice again, in my opinion, " is or was " one of the best producers of Karaoke cdg's... and this opinion is about quality and perception by this lowly KJ.

K.I.A {A} form letter? ... lol

No disagreement here...Show me a posting on this forum, where someone suggest sound choice sit still for this? please. It's not the pursuit the legit kj's object to..it's the method, and the damage caused by this method. The loss of clubs, the loss of reputation, the bad name this is giving the karaoke industry as a whole. I do this as a hobby. And i'll tell ya...the ripple effect is already starting where i'm at. I predect, clubs will be going to DJ's, single accoustic guitar acts, small combos' piano singalongs, comedy acts, pool tables, video games. And...we have the shoddy messy tactics of the sleps to blame.
Don't come crying to me rikkie.

Blame the bootleggers, and pirates. The Slep's method is probably not the best, if they are falsely accusing the legitimate KJ's, then their birddog's that are informing their legal eagles, are at fault, and should be taken out in the alley, and sternly talked to...lol

Let's ask the DJ's, single accoustic guitar acts, small combos, piano sing alongs, comedy acts, and maybe include the jukebox industry, and small time bands, what they think of the Karaoke Industry. Ouch!

It's the Karaoke Industry, that wants to coexist or compete with these proven forms of bar and nightclub entertainment, and if the Karaoke Industry can't or won't see the harm that has been done by the bootlegger's or pirates, and we don't weed them out internally (the word snitch comes to mind) by legal precedents, and court action, then we only have ourselves to blame!



It's not legal action actually..it's the threat of a legal action. Big difference there. If you think for one minute sound choice is going recoup any substatial lost profits by taking a few kj's and bars to court, and making them settle for 6 grand, then you arenaive. Sound choice is trying to make examples of these poor slobs, and nothing more. And...don't be surprised, when someone holds sound choice to task, and wins... KJ's don't have deep pockets, but the bar owners do...and i can hardly wait. Sound choice stepped on the wrong toes there. The club owners hold the purse strings for the entire karaoke industry..hang on for the ride of your life.

If the threat of a court action is all it takes, then the warning on the jewel case about unlicensed use would have sufficed... it didn't, so the next step is legal action...

Bar Owner's pockets are not as deep either right now, if they were at all... That is why they will be the one's looking for the precedents that these cases invoke, and will act with a two-edged sword once the legalities of the issue have been thrust in their face, and they must decide whether a KJ is legal or not, and if it's worth pursuing in a court of law...



Wrong, a boycott of sound choice will also hurt the retailers who legally sell sound choice disc, also any future legal download sites. Also legit kj's. I am a legal operating kj. If there were a boycot of sound choice. I would out of respect for my fellow kj's also not purchase or even play any sound choice disc. And if you think i'm a minority, again...you are naive. I also predict, because of the actions of sound choice, the KIA{A}, the slep costopo, that the download part of sound choice, although i wish their endevour a complete success. Will Ultimatly be unprofitable. Kj's..myself included, by all this confusion alone...will not feel safe downloading anything. Right now, i say over 80% of ALL kj's have absolutly no idea what is a legal download site, or if there actually are any. How the sleps will over come all this mass confusion they have started, is anyone's guess. But i betcha, it will show in profits. Perhaps the slep clan can take all the download sites out there to court to? think so? As i read the majority of forums, and have KJ & dj friends in many states, and hear even way up here. Sound choice is digging their own grave.
Again......remember that perception thing i mentioned earlier? Confusion, rumors, misinformation, threats of law suits, club owners dropping karaoke. It's happening as i type. yep..... {shakes his head and sighs}

Noted, and I agree with almost all of this assumption... and I am not an employee of the KIAA. (Sorry Dale!)