Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird74
Admin, please forgive me if this is a stupid question 
For months now I've bee reading how some things that work on XP won't work the same way on Vista and the constant difficulties you are having getting Hoster to work the same on 2 different systems.
Why not offer 2 versions of Hoster  1 for XP and 1 for Vista 
Everyone was happy with Hoster before Vista  |
Hey Sky,
That's baciscaly what they are doing but both are incorperated into Hoster, one program. When you look at the songbook "feature" of Hoster you are actually looking at a seperate porgram that is incorperated into Hoster.
See It's not that Hoster 4.03 won't run on Vista, it does. It's that it won't run videos consistantly on Vista, this is not acceptable for MTU clients. There will be two new choices (like two engines in a car) in Hoster 4.04 where basicaly a Vista user can use the player that drives Hoster now and have the Marquee, the Singer Name Display and the Preview or if their videos don't play consistanly, they can use the old player with no marquee, no Singer Name Display and no Preview.
Rock soild is the only thing that is acceptable to MTU. They are taking alot of heat from folks for refusing to compromise. They could just fix everybodies reported bugs and go on with their lives but they know Hoster can not handle the new features folks have asked for over the years unless it is rock solid.
I'm rambling, good night Sky.
Jim