View Single Post
  #36  
Old September 28th, 2007, 04:19 PM
George George is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by muzicman144 View Post
Jim
I'm not questioning the lergality of using tracks for a paid performance, i fully understand that. My question is why doesn't a live band (no tracks)have to abide by the same rules that those of us who use tracks do. It apears to be an acceptable practice that a band can play any copyrighted music on the market and the only requirement is the club/loounge etc. pay the royalty fees to BMI/ASCAP. Doesn't seem to be much different to me.

muzicman
Who says there's any difference?

Read this.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061109/092726.shtml

and this.

http://www.dmcityview.com/archives/2...06/cover.shtml

It's downloading to use for public performance that came into question here, not who's paying what fees. They're after everybody in that regard.

It appears it's the Karaoke clubs that have been getting by up 'till now.

Perhaps I'm not reading something right.
__________________
The oxen are slow,
but the earth is patient.

Erectile dysfunction treatment

Last edited by George; September 28th, 2007 at 04:41 PM.
Reply With Quote