View Single Post
  #4  
Old April 5th, 2007, 02:54 PM
jahern jahern is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bell Gardens, California
Posts: 646
Never intended for show use-Weak argument

"Microstudio was never intended for show use. That is why they (MTU) removed that function and the capability to play graphics on a second screen." ddouglass

I've been using MTU products for a long time. I am not anything more than an amatuer (sp?) as far as playing files. I do stuff at church and will probably find a way to do stuff after school with students.

MTU is certainly spicing up their newer versions of Microstudio by making it more player friendly. Keyrite-Vogone. One of the reasons I upgraded from 3.004 to 4.000 is the playing functions. None of the file importing problems that I had with 3.004 were fixed by upgrading. I think MTU is counting on the fact that they have really spruced up the playing functions to justify charging close to regular price for upgrades. So I think now that it is a cop out to say that someone has to use Hoster to enjoy normal things like saving and playing a playlist. My goodness, even M___P__R and W___MP do that and they're free!

No offense intended, but Microstudio is a player for the amatuer and shouldn't be hampered so that it doesn't perform simple functions that free software already does perform.

To paraphrase the George logo; Dissention is not the same as disloyalty
Reply With Quote