Jon,
I stand corrected regarding the difference between CDA and .WAV, but I'll not take full responsibility for the error. You'll have to grant me that CDA is commonly kicked around these forums as .Wav. When any of us have discussed regular audio files we have always referred to them as .WAV. It that context I was mis-using the term.
On the surface it appears that MTU further promotes this thinking because they use the term WAV on the duplicate disc page, WAV on the import page, and Audio on the custom assembly page, and nowhere is there an explanation of the difference as they apply to these pages, if any.
In that same context also, MTU needs to re-think their terminology in the manual because they give us not so informed laymen the impression that you cannot play regular audio through Microstudio, and it was in that sense that any controversy that manifested itself came about.
For any wanting to play CDA from the hard drive, they can do so by fooling the program and importing them to the hard drive as cdg. They can then be retrieved and played, and that's a neat trick because you can play several at a time uninterrupted. As such they cannot be used in KPRO, as they already will have a cdg extension.
I also have never felt a need to show how much I think I know. If I perceive misinformation being passed on, for the benefit of the person trying to be helped, I will try to offer a correction, in as brief a manner as possible.
If SUPPORT or ADMIN has a problem with this, then all they need do is say so.
I always try to come on low key and not give the impression that I'm MTU, like some we observe.
I can't help it if some take it as a confrontational move on my part when I do offer a correction, and esculate the situation, turning it into a contest.
In the majority of those instances where I have intervened I have been correct. Sometimes I miss the mark, this time from a purely technical standpoint, but not really, when you consider the commonly accepted use of the term WAV in these forums.
I will make the observation that if you were truly interested in preserving the purity of this thread your critisisms should have been made by private message. Jahern and I have exchanged private messages regarding this issue so's not to further cloud things. So you're not really demonstrating any different behavior than you accuse us of, are you?
I also see no point into you trying to further browbeat Strait into responding. It was made sufficiently clear at the onset that more input would be helpful, and beating him/her it to death with it serves no productive purpose.
George
The good side of all this is increased circulation. Ever notice the heavy readership whenever there's a controversy brewing
